Tuesday, May 28, 2019
To Kill A Mockingbird: Prejudice Is Part Of Our Inherent Nature :: To Kill a Mockingbird Essays
To Kill A Mockingbird Prejudice Is Part of Our Inherent NatureWhy did genus Atticus defend a nigger? What was the point of being the advocate for ablack man? It doesnt matter if their guilty or innocent, you ass ceaselesslyand effortlessly convict the animals for their coloration vice. You can even turn ablind eye to the obvious truth. And so did the people, the white, narrow-minded, bigoted and hypocritical people of Maycomb.The justification for why Atticus broke from the norm, and acted unlike mostothers in his community, can be compared to the motive of the central characterin the novel, A Time To Kill, written by bum Grisham. The comparativecharacter, a lawyer named Jake, also endangers not only his own life but hisfamilys, by defending a Negro. He is compelled to undergo such(prenominal) a risk as hebelieves he is protecting an innocent man. Despite the fact that he is black.Jake could not live with himself if he failed to give his consequence effort inclearing the accused , Carl Lee Haileys, name. The lawyer feels that it is hisobligation to humanity to do so. Similarly, the case Atticus accepts issomething which goes to the essence of a mans own conscience. Atticus is futile to treat the underdogs of the town how the majority of people act towardsthem. Clearly the people of Maycomb are narrow-minded, bigoted and hypocritical,and Atticus Finch is not. Nothing can be done to fudge the prejudiced, perversepeople hear the truth. This dogmatic attitude does not occur exclusivelybetween the whites and the Negroes either. The communitys unsubstantiatedstories about other citizens also demonstrate their absorbed to the truth andprejudiced natures.Arthur Radley, otherwise labelled Boo, has for decades been maliciouslyslandered, in the county. The people that have done so do not know Arthur, andthe reason they can make such judgments escapes me. When there was a series ofpets being mysteriously slaughtered, the consensus was that it was performed byBoo. Lat er, when the culprit transpired to be someone else, most people werestill grow in the belief that Boo was to blame. They could not believe thetruth. And all unsolved crimes committed, in the area, have been manufacturedsolely by him. If your garden freezes it is because he hard on it and nutsand other fruits, grown on the Radley property, are considered poisonous. Whyhave these allegations been targeted on Arthur? All that distinguishes him fromother folks is that he isolates himself from the community. Is privacy a crime?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.