Tuesday, May 28, 2019
To Kill A Mockingbird: Prejudice Is Part Of Our Inherent Nature :: To Kill a Mockingbird Essays
To Kill A Mockingbird Prejudice Is Part of Our Inherent NatureWhy did genus Atticus defend a nigger? What was the point of being the advocate for ablack man? It doesnt matter if their guilty or innocent, you can ceaselesslyand effortlessly convict the animals for their colour vice. You can even turn ablind eye to the obvious truth. And so did the great deal, the white, narrow-minded, bigoted and hypocritical people of Maycomb.The plea for why Atticus broke from the norm, and acted unlike mostothers in his community, can be compared to the motive of the central characterin the novel, A Time To Kill, write by John Grisham. The comparativecharacter, a lawyer named Jake, withal endangers not only his hold life but hisfamilys, by defending a Negro. He is compelled to undergo such a risk as hebelieves he is protecting an innocent man. Despite the fact that he is black.Jake could not live with himself if he failed to give his utmost effort inclearing the accused, Carl Lee Haileys, nam e. The lawyer feels that it is hisobligation to humanity to do so. Similarly, the case Atticus accepts issomething which goes to the essence of a mans own conscience. Atticus isunable to treat the underdogs of the town how the majority of people act towardsthem. Clearly the people of Maycomb are narrow-minded, bigoted and hypocritical,and Atticus Finch is not. Nothing can be done to make the prejudiced, perversepeople hear the truth. This dogmatic attitude does not occur exclusivelybetween the whites and the Negroes either. The communitys unsubstantiatedstories about other citizens also demonstrate their heedless to the truth andprejudiced natures.Arthur Radley, otherwise labelled Boo, has for decades been maliciouslyslandered, in the county. The people that have done so do not sleep with Arthur, andthe reason they can make such judgments escapes me. When there was a series ofpets being mysteriously slaughtered, the consensus was that it was performed byBoo. Later, when the culprit transpired to be someone else, most people werestill rooted in the belief that Boo was to blame. They could not believe thetruth. And all unsolved crimes committed, in the area, have been manufacturedsolely by him. If your tend freezes it is because he breathed on it and nutsand other fruits, grown on the Radley property, are considered poisonous. Whyhave these allegations been targeted on Arthur? All that distinguishes him fromother folks is that he isolates himself from the community. Is privacy a crime?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.